The Cross-dressing Lie Against Muhammad (peace be upon him) – Ken Temple Gets Humiliated and Runs Away

The Quran and Bible Blog

Ken Temple is getting annihilated on Blogging Theology. First, he lost his nerve in the face of incessant heckling by a fellow Christian (Emma, the whore of Babylon), and just recently, he was humiliated after recycling the bogus claim made by the likes of Sam Shamoun and David Wood that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) enjoyed wearing women’s clothing. Once he was refuted (I responded to his copy and paste methodology by copying the excellent response by brother Waqar Akbar Cheema), Temple tried to lie by claiming he never made that argument! But as we can see from the screenshots below, he lost his nerve again and just could not bring himself around to admit that he was wrong. Since it was a lengthy exchange, after which Temple made a hasty retreat, please see the comments on Blogging Theology.

Ken Temple - cross-dressing 1Ken Temple - cross-dressing 2Ken Temple - cross-dressing 3Ken Temple - cross-dressing 4Ken Temple - cross-dressing 5Ken Temple - cross-dressing 6Ken Temple - cross-dressing 7Ken Temple - cross-dressing 8Ken Temple - cross-dressing 9Ken Temple - cross-dressing 10Ken Temple - cross-dressing 11

View original post



Categories: Islam

46 replies

  1. Here’s the annihilation to Muhammad’s dog: https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/11/21/revisiting-the-issue-of-muhammads-cross-dressing/

    Now if this rabid puppy thinks we got annihilated then have him email me so we can set up two debates, one on his xxxx xxxxx cross-dressing, and the other on Q. 17:1. I won’t be holding my breath.

    And thanks to this dog I am now going to repost our series of articles and rebuttals on my social media pages so people can see what a xxx xxx human being Muhammad truly was. So thanks to this dog for foaming at the key board.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I will keep mentioning Sam in comments and articles. I hope he mention my name in his articles. With my 6 twitter followers, business is not looking good. Thanks to brother, Paul I have a few. Or else I’ll be the only follower of my twitter page. So Sam please make me famous, I need you.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Apart from the fight between hate preachers … So God prefers the blanket of one woman to the ones of other women? Seriously? And who is interested in this nonsense in the 21 century?

    Like

    • @ Agnostic

      It has nothing to do with God’s favor of her blanket he is basically saying:

      Hey, don’t harm me by harming Aisha(ra) she is the only wife I have ever received revelations while being embraced by her.

      That’s it. But because you all don’t know what you’re talking about you just make claims without ever reading contexts. This is again why no one addresses you respectfully because you are only interested in corny attempts at trolling.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Pavov’s blog’s understanding of Islam: the wish for fastest growing nonsense on earth.

    Like

  5. No academic scholar-Montgomery Watt, F.E.Peters, Kenneth Cragg, Uri Rubin, Michael Lecker, Gregor Schoeler, Andreas Goerke, etc.- claims Muhammad(saw) was a cross-dresser. In fact, this polemic originates not with any scholar but with…Sam Shamoun. So let me get this: in the 1400+ years of Islam’s existence, the ONLY person who noticed Muhammad(saw) was a cross-dresser happens to be some random idiot on the internet who IRL has no formal education to speak of and who suffers from mental health issues?

    Liked by 4 people

  6. “Temple made a hasty retreat, . . .”

    Or I just don’t have time to waste my time on you and I will post whatever does not take me much time to refute your arguments .

    Like

  7. ok, but why is he claiming to get revelations when he puts on Aisha’s blanket?
    “Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspirations do not come to me when I am in the [thowb] cloth (i.e. blanket) of any of wives except [in that of] Aisha.” (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2393)

    “don’t hurt me”
    Your prophet
    Muhammad sounds like a cry baby

    Like

  8. @ Agnostic

    You sound retarded the opposing side is claiming that he was dressing in his wives clothing and receiving revelations and that is a lie.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. @ Ken

    Don’t see how this seems much more cry, baby like to me:

    6And the LORD regretted that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him in His heart. 7So the LORD said, “I will blot out man, whom I have created, from the face of the earth—every man and beast and crawling creature and bird of the air—for I am grieved that I have made them.” (Genesis 6:6-7)

    11“I regret that I have made Saul king, for he has turned away from following Me and has not carried out My instructions.” (1 Samuel 15:11)

    … “My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me? (Matt 27:46, Psalm 22:1)

    I mean we’re not even counting Job and Moses whining. I mean the whole book has entire chapters dedicated to God or people complaining about God’s Decree.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. It means sheet/ blanket! It’s even narrated in Sahih Bukhari itself as ( Blanket لحاف).
    Also, hadith about how we should cover the dead person. It’s used the term ( thawb) which means sheet like Ihram. Christians are so ignornat. This is a fact.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. Agnostic, shouldn’t you be messaging your side dude on Grindr? Leave this blog for good

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: